As, they do not have much knowledge about the fossils they will overlook the important details. So, they will not miss the opportunity to study the fossil or miss out any information regarding the fossil.įinally, the passage contends that unprofessional wealthy fossil seekers will destroy valuable scientific evidence. On the other hand, the professor posits that usually after the discovery of fossil, it is first studied by a scientist to know about it's authenticity. Schools and library will display them for the public.įurthermore, the author states that scientists will not be able to obtain ample amount of information from the fossils as they will not get assess to fossils to study them. On the contrary, the speaker argues that people will have greater opportunity to view these fossils. He mentions that the disadvantages mentioned in passage about ownership of fossils to rich collectors outweigh the advantages.įirst of all, the writer posits that if fossils are with wealthier collectors then general public would not be able to view the fossils and will lose interest to study them. The lecture cast doubt on all the points mentioned in the passage. The author believes that the fossils should belongs to scientific experts and museums. In this set of materials, the reading and lecture both are discussing about ownership of fossils.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |